Contract review that shows its work
Upload a contract and get clauses extracted, obligations dated and risks flagged against your own playbook, with every finding linked back to the exact paragraph it came from.
Six things the review does before you open the file
Not a summary. A structured pass over the contract that leaves you with something to act on.
Clause extraction
Every operative clause pulled out and labelled by type, whether the contract follows your numbering or none at all.
Playbook comparison
Each clause compared against your firm's standard position, so deviations surface instead of hiding in paragraph 14(c).
Obligations and dates
Notice periods, renewal windows, termination triggers and payment dates extracted into a list you can diarise.
Risk flagging
Unlimited liability, one-sided indemnities, automatic renewal and governing-law mismatches called out with the text that triggered them.
Missing-clause detection
What the contract does not say, checked against the clauses a deal of this type normally carries.
Cited findings
Every point links to the paragraph it came from, so verification is a click rather than a re-read.
Four steps, minutes rather than hours
Upload the contract
PDF, Word or a scan. Whisperit reads the document as it is, without you first converting or retyping it.
Set the position you are reviewing from
Buy side or sell side, your playbook or the counterparty's draft. The same clause is a problem or a win depending on which chair you are sitting in.
Read the structured pass
Clauses, obligations, risks and gaps, each one linked to its source paragraph.
Decide, then export
Accept, reject or redraft each point, then export the marked-up contract or a client-ready summary.
What is flagged, and what stays your call
The tool narrows the search. The judgement is still yours, and the professional rules say it has to be.
| Clause | What the review flags | What you decide |
|---|---|---|
| Limitation of liability | Caps absent, uncapped heads of loss, asymmetry between the parties | Whether the cap is commercially acceptable for this deal |
| Indemnities | Scope wider than the matching warranty, no notice or conduct provisions | Which risks the client is willing to carry |
| Termination | Notice periods, automatic renewal, termination for convenience on one side only | Whether the exit terms match the client's plans |
| Governing law and jurisdiction | Mismatch between governing law, jurisdiction and the arbitration clause | Which forum actually serves the client |
| Data protection | Missing processor terms, transfers outside Switzerland without safeguards | Whether the nFADP position is defensible |
First pass on a 40-page agreement
| Task | Manual | With Whisperit |
|---|---|---|
| Reading and marking up the draft | 2 to 3 hours | 10 minutes |
| Listing obligations and key dates | 45 minutes | Extracted with the pass |
| Comparing against your standard position | 1 hour | Deviations surfaced automatically |
| Drafting the client summary | 45 minutes | Generated, then edited |
AI contract review, answered
Does it replace a lawyer's review?
No, and it is not built to. The review narrows a 40-page document to the dozen points that need a decision, and every one of those decisions stays with you. Swiss professional rules do not allow that judgement to be delegated to a tool, and nothing here tries to.
What happens to the contracts I upload?
They are processed and stored in Switzerland, under Swiss jurisdiction, encrypted in transit and at rest, and they are not used to train models. For a firm bound by professional secrecy, that is the difference between a usable tool and one nobody can sign off.
Can it use our own playbook?
Yes. You upload your standard positions and fallback language once, and the review compares each clause against them rather than against a generic template. The deviations it reports are deviations from how your firm actually works.
Which contract types does it handle?
Commercial agreements, employment contracts, NDAs, leases, supply and service agreements, and share purchase agreements. It reads scanned documents as well as native files.
How accurate is the clause extraction?
Accurate enough that the first pass is worth reading, not accurate enough to file unread. Every extracted point cites the paragraph it came from, precisely so that verifying it is quick. That is the workflow we recommend and the one the professional rules require.
See it on one of your own contracts
Upload an agreement you have already reviewed, and compare what it finds against what you found.